Scan comparison

Scan A (current)
97 turbometrics.io
18 Aug 2026 1:00 AM · 🇩🇪 Falkenstein
vs. 0
Scan B (comparison)
turbometrics.io 97
23 Aug 2026 10:00 AM · 🇩🇪 Falkenstein

Filmstrip comparison

Scan A 01:00 97
288 ms
478 ms
890 ms
920 ms
Scan B 10:00 97
288 ms
FCP
478 ms
LCP
890 ms
920 ms
Finished
FCP
144 ms vs. 292 ms -148 ms
LCP
144 ms vs. 292 ms -148 ms
Finished
- vs. 920 ms
Score
97 vs. 97 ±0

Scores

Category Scan A Change Scan B
Total 97 0 97
Speed 100 0 100
Images 93 0 93
Caching 91 0 91
WordPress 100 0 100
Technical 100 0 100

Core metrics

Desktop profile (1440 px). Positive delta (A − B): scan A is worse; negative delta: scan A is better.

Metric Scan A Change Scan B
TTFB i 445 ms +362 ms 83 ms
FCP i 144 ms -148 ms 292 ms
LCP i 144 ms -148 ms 292 ms
CLS i 0 ≈ 0 0
TBT i 0 ms ≈ 0 0 ms
Requests i 7 ≈ 0 7
Data volume i 46,8 KB ≈ 0 46,8 KB

Page build timing

Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.

Desktop (1440 px)

Phase Scan A Change Scan B
DNS - 6 ms
TCP connection - 27 ms
TTFB - 101 ms
Transfer - 5 ms
DOM loaded - 260 ms
Page loaded - 282 ms

Mobile (390 px)

Phase Scan A Change Scan B
DNS - 5 ms
TCP connection - 38 ms
TTFB - 132 ms
Transfer - 1 ms
DOM loaded - 283 ms
Page loaded - 300 ms

Findings comparison

Problems and warnings compared between the two scans (bad/warning only).

Unchanged (2)

Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.

Score breakdown

Which individual points influence the score the most.

Scan A Label Scan B
Images
No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) −3 pts
No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) −4 pts
Caching
Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) −5 pts
No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) −4 pts