Scan comparison

Scan A (current)
94 turbometrics.io
5 Sep 2026 1:00 AM · 🇩🇪 Falkenstein
vs. +18
Scan B (comparison)
turbometrics.io 76
6 Sep 2026 1:00 PM · 🇩🇪 Falkenstein

Filmstrip comparison

Scan A 01:00 94
204 ms
FCP
309 ms
LCP
805 ms
807 ms
Finished
204 ms
309 ms
805 ms
807 ms
Scan B 13:00 76
13.1 s
FCP
13.2 s
LCP
13.7 s
13.7 s
Finished
FCP
188 ms vs. 2.120 ms -1.932 ms
LCP
188 ms vs. 2.120 ms -1.932 ms
Finished
807 ms vs. 13.684 ms -12.877 ms
Score
94 vs. 76 +18

Scores

Category Scan A Change Scan B
Total 94 +18 76
Speed 92 +41 51
Images 93 +7 86
Caching 91 0 91
WordPress 100 0 100
Technical 100 0 100

Core metrics

Desktop profile (1440 px). Positive delta (A − B): scan A is worse; negative delta: scan A is better.

Metric Scan A Change Scan B
TTFB i 548 ms -12.334 ms 12.882 ms
FCP i 188 ms -1.932 ms 2.120 ms
LCP i 188 ms -1.932 ms 2.120 ms
CLS i 0 ≈ 0 0
TBT i 0 ms ≈ 0 0 ms
Requests i 6 ≈ 0 6
Data volume i 47,4 KB ≈ 0 47,4 KB

Page build timing

Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.

Desktop (1440 px)

Phase Scan A Change Scan B
DNS 6 ms ≈ 0 9 ms
TCP connection 13 ms ≈ 0 18 ms
TTFB 108 ms -12.841 ms 12.949 ms
Transfer 1 ms ≈ 0 2 ms
DOM loaded 204 ms -12.833 ms 13.037 ms
Page loaded 206 ms -12.833 ms 13.039 ms

Mobile (390 px)

Phase Scan A Change Scan B
DNS 6 ms ≈ 0 9 ms
TCP connection 11 ms ≈ 0 17 ms
TTFB 113 ms -1.930 ms 2.043 ms
Transfer 2 ms ≈ 0 2 ms
DOM loaded 180 ms -1.943 ms 2.123 ms
Page loaded 195 ms -1.929 ms 2.124 ms

Findings comparison

Problems and warnings compared between the two scans (bad/warning only).

New in scan A (1)

Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 548 ms.

Resolved since scan B (2)

First visible content appears late
The First Contentful Paint is around 2120 ms.
Server responds slowly
The server response takes around 12882 ms. That slows down page rendering very early on.

Unchanged (2)

Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.

Score breakdown

Which individual points influence the score the most.

Scan A Label Scan B
Speed
−8 pts Slightly elevated TTFB (Server response approx. 548 ms)
Very high TTFB (Server response approx. 12882 ms) −40 pts
Elevated FCP (First Contentful Paint approx. 2120 ms) −6 pts
Elevated DOMContentLoaded (DOMContentLoaded approx. 2123 ms) −3 pts
Images
−3 pts No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) −6 pts
−4 pts No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) −8 pts
Caching
−5 pts Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) −5 pts
−4 pts No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) −4 pts